SMART on FHIR Apps
Clinician EHR-launch, patient standalone, and backend apps — OAuth 2.0, launch context, US Core, validated against Inferno g10.
Multi-EHR Integration Architecture
Before you commit to a delivery date, understand the access path. Compare vendor APIs, authorization models and customer dependencies, then decide what your product should standardize—and what stays vendor-specific.
For healthcare product leaders, engineering teams and health IT teams.
Who uses it? Which data? Read, write or both?
Vendor capabilities · customer approval · authorization
Shared product model + vendor-specific adapters
An architecture plan that separates reusable work from site-specific work.
Illustrative delivery path · no patient dataClear scope.
Tangible deliverables.
This guide helps engineering teams compare platforms and plan their architecture. Our EHR and EMR integration service covers implementation: adapters, data mapping, customer-environment testing, rollout and agreed operational handover.
Technical reference: HL7 FHIR implementation concepts ↗An EHR’s API catalogue is only the starting point. Product version, enabled endpoints, customer permissions and review requirements can change the integration scope. Confirm each dependency before setting a delivery date.
We've walked those paths. We build the integration and navigate each vendor's program so integration stops being the thing that stalls your enterprise deals.
Epic Vendor Services, Oracle code Console, athenahealth's Platform Services contract — each has its own gate.
A connection in one health system does not establish access in another. Confirm each customer’s approvals and network requirements.
OAuth scopes, data handling, and a security review stand between your sandbox app and a production Client ID.
Every vendor's actual 2026 program, APIs, sandbox, and the gotcha that trips teams up — the map we use to get you live. Select an EHR.
Plan clinical app launch, backend data access or an interface workflow against the customer’s Epic environment.
Map the requested resources and read/write operations to the target Epic endpoint. Validate the SMART launch or backend authorization path required by the workflow.
Use the relevant Epic developer documentation and test environment. Record the client IDs, redirect URIs and scopes for each environment.
Check app-change procedures and supported search or export parameters before designing a release. Do not assume sandbox capabilities match the customer environment.
Confirm customer activation and any applicable agreements, listing requirements and fees directly with Epic and the health system.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Assess the Oracle Health platform, API version and customer environment before defining implementation scope.
Inventory the customer’s Oracle Health platform and available API versions before selecting a migration or new-build approach.
Register and test through the applicable Oracle Health developer environment. Exercise the actual resource operations and authorization scopes required.
For a legacy integration, check the current support and retirement notices. Migration scope depends on the endpoints and behaviours the application uses.
Distinguish the customer’s product and platform from historical Cerner branding when locating documentation and requesting access.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Map the workflow to the appropriate athenahealth API family and customer authorization.
Choose between the available FHIR and vendor-specific API paths by workflow, resource coverage and authorization model.
Confirm the registration, credential and commercial requirements for the particular API family. Sandbox access is not production approval.
Record the customer authorization and network requirements. Do not assume a VPN is required for every athenahealth API integration.
Separate the data you need from the API programme that grants it, and confirm contractual scope before development.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Start with the hospital’s MEDITECH product and supported integration capabilities.
Check the customer’s MEDITECH product and version, required data and available read or write operations.
Use the applicable MEDITECH developer environment to test with sample data, then validate against the customer’s target environment.
A successful sandbox test does not establish that a hospital has enabled the same endpoints or permissions.
For scheduling and patient-engagement workflows, confirm the specific operations and access model rather than assuming a clinical-data API includes them.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Separate the Veradigm product, available API operations and distribution requirements.
Evaluate the applicable Veradigm APIs against the required clinical workflow. Treat read access and write-back as separate scope decisions.
Confirm developer registration, environment access and any partner programme requirements for the chosen product.
Validate that the required operations are supported and authorized. Do not assume an available FHIR read endpoint permits updates.
Identify the specific customer product when following older Allscripts references; historical brand names alone are not an API specification.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Match the NextGen product and integration programme to your intended customer workflow.
Identify the specific NextGen product, API family and authorization model that can support your workflow.
Confirm the programme appropriate to internal customer use or third-party distribution, and obtain current access requirements.
Check customer version, permissions and deployment requirements before promising availability of an operation.
Request the current commercial terms for your distribution and data scope; do not infer production pricing from developer access.
Translate these findings into the access plan, data mapping, integration tests and customer rollout checklist.
Planning checklist, not a guarantee of vendor compatibility. Confirm current documentation and customer-specific access before implementation. Epic documentation · Oracle Health documentation · athenahealth documentation
EHR integration isn't one technique. We pick the right one — or combine them — for your use case.
_since.The technical build is half the job. The other half is each vendor's program and every customer's authorization. Here's the path we run.
Register on the vendor portal; build & test against example data (fhir.epic.com, code Console, Greenfield…).
Get Non-Production & Production Client IDs; declare exact OAuth scopes.
US Core-conformant reads/writes, validated against Inferno g10.
Scopes, data handling, and (for many) a questionnaire + pen test.
Each health system signs off — consent forms, agreements, network access as applicable.
Production credentials, marketplace listing (Showroom / App Expo / Marketplace), monitoring.
From a single SMART app to a multi-EHR strategy — engineered and shepherded through each vendor's program.
Clinician EHR-launch, patient standalone, and backend apps — OAuth 2.0, launch context, US Core, validated against Inferno g10.
Read and write the record across vendors — Patient, Observation, MedicationRequest, DocumentReference and the rest of US Core.
ADT, ORU, ORM, SIU feeds via Mirth Connect / interface engines — for real-time events and sites where FHIR coverage is partial.
One integration layer across Epic, Oracle Health, athena and more — so your product isn't rewritten per vendor.
Registration, Client IDs, and listings on Epic Showroom / Vendor Services, athenahealth Marketplace, Veradigm App Expo.
OAuth scope hygiene, data-handling docs, questionnaires, pen-test prep, BAA — to support the customer’s review and identify gaps early.
EHR openness isn't goodwill — it's regulation. These are the standards we build to and the mandates driving the roadmap.
FHIR R4 (4.0.1) with US Core profiles over the USCDI data set — with the applicable profile version and resource coverage confirmed for the endpoint.
Two launch flows (EHR + standalone) and granular v2 scopes — c/r/u/d/s per resource (e.g. patient/Observation.rs) replacing v1's coarse read/write.
The ONC/ASTP Standardized API certification requires FHIR R4 + US Core + SMART + Bulk Data, tested with the Inferno kit. It's why the APIs exist — and the bar we build to.
The CMS Interoperability & Prior Authorization rule requires impacted payers to run FHIR Patient Access, Provider Access, Payer-to-Payer & Prior-Auth APIs.▲ Most requirements effective Jan 1, 2027
Certification requirements evolve. Record the applicable criteria, profile versions and customer capabilities; a published data standard does not guarantee every field is populated.
TEFCA/QHINs and FHIR Bulk Data $export push exchange from per-patient calls toward population-scale — where roadmaps are heading.
Regulatory summary for orientation; dates and scope evolve — we confirm current requirements per engagement.
Agree on these outputs during scoping. Your team should know what it will receive and how to review it.
Required clinical data and operations mapped to each vendor’s supported access path.
Customer approvals, commercial onboarding, sandbox limits and environment setup made explicit.
A documented rationale for direct adapters, an integration platform or a hybrid approach.
A fixed scope with a fixed price, or a dedicated EHR-integration team as an extension of yours.
Best when the target EHR and use case are clear. Share the requirement, get a discovery call, and receive a fixed estimate and timeline — milestone-billed.
Best for a multi-EHR roadmap. Dedicated FHIR / SMART / HL7 engineers with 160 focused hours each per month — an extension of your team.
The questions every team asks before they start.
Book a scoping call — we'll map your target EHR, the right integration method, the program and review gates, and a realistic path to a live customer. Reviewed by an integration engineer, not a sales queue.
Iselin, NJ 08830
Baner, Pune, MH 411045
A Nirmitee integration engineer will reach out within one business day.