Build a patient-facing companion app
Connect an approved patient authorization journey to the records your experience needs, with clear handling of unavailable data.
For mobile health products connecting to Epic customers
Bring supported Epic information into your patient or clinician mobile experience. We work through authorization, account linking, session behavior and customer-specific capabilities before treating a sandbox connection as a production integration.
Scope your Epic mobile integrationDigital health companies building native or cross-platform applications for organizations using Epic.
Approved app entry and user identity
Supported SMART flow and granted scopes
Correct patient, encounter and permitted data
Expired sessions, reauthorization and logout
Illustrative workflow · scope tailored to your environment
Start with the real problem
Real users switch accounts, lose connectivity, return from another application and leave sessions open on shared devices. An integration needs to preserve the right patient context through those transitions. We validate the intended launch environment and Epic customer configuration instead of assuming that one demo tenant represents every deployment.
Your starting point
Connect an approved patient authorization journey to the records your experience needs, with clear handling of unavailable data.
Design how the clinician enters the app, acquires context and completes the permitted task without carrying stale context into another patient session.
Turn test credentials and sample data into customer-specific onboarding, security review and production validation.
The Engineering Engagement
Workstreams are selected around your priorities. Each comes with an output your team can inspect, test and own.
Identify the Epic customer, application role, supported APIs, resource coverage and permitted read/write operations.
Implement the supported authorization flow, redirect handling, session binding and granted-scope checks for your client type.
Handle app backgrounding, connectivity loss, expired tokens, logout and changing user or patient context.
Preserve source identifiers, status and dates. Distinguish missing access from no available clinical information.
Prepare configuration, test evidence and support ownership for the actual customer environment.
Expertise is in the decisions
The desired patient entry point and any embedding or launch experience require customer and vendor confirmation. Do not assume that access to one API grants access to every Epic mobile surface.
Validate each intended operation. A product that reads observations cannot assume it can create an order or update a chart using the same permission set.
Choose what may be cached, for how long and under which protection and logout behavior. Keep credentials and patient payloads out of analytics and crash reports.
We do not control Epic customer approvals, licensing or production access. These are explicit dependencies in the delivery plan.
This is an independent integration engineering offering. Vendor names identify the systems involved, not a certification, affiliation or universal capability guarantee.
From discussion to delivery
Agree the user, entry point, required information and supported customer environment.
Test the supported flow and representative resource coverage.
Handle context, session changes, connectivity and permitted actions.
Review security, customer configuration and end-to-end acceptance evidence.
We agree the scope, dependencies, acceptance criteria and commercial model before implementation. Your existing team can stay involved throughout.
Find the right starting point ↗We can assess the client architecture and supported authorization pattern for the intended Epic workflow. The language or framework does not remove customer-specific access requirements.
Not automatically. API availability, configuration, permissions and onboarding must be qualified for each intended deployment.
Only where the specific operation is supported and authorized. We confirm the capability and validate the receiving workflow rather than inferring write access from read access.
No. We build the agreed third-party application workflow. Whether it complements or connects with a particular patient-portal experience depends on supported interfaces and customer approval.
A useful first conversation
Tell us what exists today, who uses it and where the workflow breaks. We’ll discuss the scope, access dependencies and the next practical step.
A product overview and a de-identified workflow are enough to start. No patient records or credentials are needed.
These are independent reference sources, not endorsements. Applicability, platform access and current requirements are confirmed for your project.